(UPDATED) Maine Sovereign Citizens, er, “Constitutional Coalition” Send “Courtesy Notice” to ALL Maine Lobbyists

Posted on August 20, 2014. Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , |

UPDATE: McCarthy has vehemently denied that he sent the emails to the non-profits, nor a second email entitled “Attention Kind Alleged Representatives” to currently serving Maine lawmakers (Reps. Diane Russell and Drew Gattine among others to receive that second missive). But he did post comments to the Bangor Daily News story that he later deleted:

 

  • Jack Mccarthy ·  Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life

    Relax folks that is a total LIE never saw that site never sent ANY such email. Apparently Mr. Mario Moretto was severely threatened by someone for not trying to discredit us in his last article. Obvious attempt to promote some agenda with zero fact check. If that was sent by Me why wasn’t a verifying email sent to the original sender? Shame on you Mr. Mario Moretto it appeared that you had as least some journalistic ethic. Sadly no.
    Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · 53 minutes ago
    • Jack Mccarthy ·  Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life

      Jack Mccarthy · Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life
      Actually it might be nice to own a controlling interest in the BDN.
      Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

      Jack Mccarthy · Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life
      Mr.Mario Moretto there must be an immediate front page above the fold RETRACTION AND APOLOGY, THIS IS LIBELOUS IN THE EXTREME.
      Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

      Jack Mccarthy · Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life
      Relax folks that is a total LIE never saw that site never sent ANY such email. Apparently Mr. Mario Moretto was severely threatened by someone for not trying to discredit us in his last article. Obvious attempt to promote some agenda with zero fact check. If that was sent by Me why wasn’t a verifying email sent to the original sender? Shame on you Mr. Mario Moretto it appeared that you had as least some journalistic ethic. Sadly no.

      Reply · Like · 46 minutes ago
  • Dan Sorrells · New Haven

    I always get a kick out of how dense these guys are: they create a bunch of foolish legal documents and instruments so that their assertions appear legitimate to the government they are declaring is illegitimate!
    Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · 3 hours ago
    • Dan Sorrells · New Haven

      Slow down there, Top Commenter. Quality is taking a serious hit at the expense of quantity…
      Reply · Like · 1 · 2 hours ago
  • Jack Mccarthy ·  Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life

    Mr.Mario Moretto there must be an immediate front page above the fold RETRACTION AND APOLOGY, THIS IS LIBELOUS IN THE EXTREME.
    Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · 49 minutes ago
  • Jack Mccarthy ·  Top Commenter · School of Hard Knocks, University of Life

    Actually it might be nice to own a controlling interest in the BDN.
    Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · 50 minutes ago
  • Jonathan Albrecht ·  Top Commenter · Temple University

    When is Jack’s next meeting with LePage?
    Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · 39 minutes ago

 

With those “threats” in mind, this post is being updated with the addition of “[or whomever posted, using the name “Jack McCarthy”]” where applicable.

—–

Oh my- looks like Paul LePage’s buddies have “GONE ROGUE”.

Check it out all you lobbying kiddos; you have ALL. BEEN SERVED.

First the blast email (thankfully their CAPLOCK ISSUE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN SOMEWHAT FIXED) that Aroostook Watchmen radio host Jack McCarthy [or whomever posted, using the name “Jack McCarthy”] mailed out, late this afternoon- to every single registered Maine lobbyist.

Protip: Someone wanna tell Ole Jack [or whomever posted, using the name “Jack McCarthy”] what a “bcc” is? Thanks awfully!

100_0295

    Attention Kind Maine Lobbyists:

Be it known by these presents, the attached pdf file, titled “COURTESY NOTICE”, which details are self explanatory but specifically …

Government Charters Cancelled: (Refer: DECLARATION OF FACTS: UCC Doc # 2012127914 Nov 28 2012)

“…That any and all CHARTERS, inclusive of The United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES, “STATE of …”,

Inclusive of any and all abbreviations, idem sonans, or other legal, financial or managerial forms, any and all international equivalents, inclusive of any and all OFFICES, inclusive of any and all OFFICERS, PUBLIC SERVANTS, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONSTITUTIONS, MEMBERSHIP, ACTS, and any and all other contracts and agreements made thereunder and thereby, are now, void, worthless, or otherwise cancelled, unrebutted; …”

You have been served,

All Persons Foreign and Domestic
http://opencheckbook.maine.gov/transparency/index.html

Here is the pdf.

View this document on Scribd

———————-

2015 UPDATE: Seems that they complained to Scribd about the public sharing of a pdf that they blanket emailed to every 126th Maine legislator and all Maine registered lobbyists, the end result being the document being pulled.

Let’s try that again.

Courtesy Notice

———————–

Quick- someone call Brent Littlefield back, so he can

LePage spokesman Brett Littlefield repeatedly avoids answering questions from reporter Rob Caldwell about the governor's multiple conversation with sovereign citizens, er, "Constitutional Coalition" members in the Governor's State House office.

LePage spokesman Brett Littlefield repeatedly avoids answering questions from reporter Rob Caldwell about the governor’s multiple conversation with sovereign citizens, er, “Constitutional Coalition” members in the Governor’s State House office.

… do some more …

Um…

You know…

I wasn’t there…

stalling.

(Will be updated as needed.)

—–

*RELATED: (UPDATED) Paul LePage And Sovereign Citizens “Maine Constitutional Coalition”: A Timeline

Constitutional Coalition Return To Augusta To Announce New “Government Watch Group”

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

One Response to “(UPDATED) Maine Sovereign Citizens, er, “Constitutional Coalition” Send “Courtesy Notice” to ALL Maine Lobbyists”

RSS Feed for Maine Progressives Warehouse Comments RSS Feed

Here is what the “Constitutional Coalition” has actually been working on- emergency legislation. How that jives with their beliefs that none within the Legislature is serving with any sort of legal authority is a wonder…

1. Proposed Fourth Amendment Protection Act (Emergency)

    Proposed Fourth Amendment Protection Act (Emergency)
    August 18, 2014 by Wayne Leach
    Maine Proposed Emergency Legislation

    Fourth Amendment Protection Act

    Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Maine:

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Maine 4th Amendment Protection Act.”

    SECTION 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO FEDERAL AGENCIES ENGAGED IN ILLEGAL COLLECTION OF ELECTRONIC DATA OR METADATA

    This state and its political subdivisions shall not assist, participate with, or provide material support or resources to enable or facilitate, a federal agency in the collection or use of a person’s electronic data or meta data, without that person’s informed consent, or a warrant, based upon probable cause, that particularly describes the person, place, or thing to be searched or seized, or in accordance with a legally recognized exception to the warrant requirements.

    SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY

    The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.

    SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE

    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

2. Proposed Emergency Legislation to Protect the Right to Keep & Bear Arms

    Proposed Emergency Legislation to Protect the Right to Keep & Bear Arms
    August 18, 2014 by Wayne Leach
    Proposed Emergency Legislation

    Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Maine:

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Maine 2nd Amendment Preservation Act.”

    SECTION 2. FINDINGS

    The Legislature of the State of Maine finds:

    (1) that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental individual right that shall not be infringed;

    (2) that it is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act to protect Maine employees, including law enforcement officers, from being directed, through federal executive orders, agency orders, statutes, laws, rules, or regulations enacted or promulgated on or after the effective date of this act, to violate their oath of office and individual rights affirmed under the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution for the United States and Article I, §16 of the Constitution of the State of Maine;

    (3) that pursuant to and in furtherance of the principles of federalism enshrined in the Constitution of the United States, the federal government may not commandeer this State’s officers, agents, or employees to participate in the enforcement or facilitation of any federal program not expressly required by the Constitution of the United States;

    (4) that this right to be free from the commandeering hand of the federal government has been most notably recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Printz v. United States when the Court held: ‘The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program; and

    (5) that the anti-commandeering principles recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in Printz v. United States are predicated upon the advice of James Madison, who in Federalist #46 advised “a refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union” in response to either unconstitutional federal measures or constitutional but unpopular federal measures.

    SECTION 3. PROHIBITIONS

    A. Other than compliance with an order of the court, notwithstanding any law, regulation, rule or order to the contrary, no agency of this state, political subdivision of this state, or employee of an agency or political subdivision of this state acting in his or her official capacity shall:

    (1) Knowingly and willingly participate in any way in the enforcement of any federal act, law, order, rule, or regulation issued, enacted or promulgated on or after the effective date of this act regarding a personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition.

    (2) Utilize any assets, state funds, or funds allocated by the state to local entities on or after the effective date of this act, in whole or in part, to engage in any activity that aids a federal agency, federal agent, or corporation providing services to the federal government in the enforcement or any investigation pursuant to the enforcement of any federal act, law, order, rule, or regulation issued, enacted or promulgated on or after the effective date of this act regarding a personal firearm, firearm accessory, or ammunition.

    SECTION 4. PENALTIES

    A. Any agent or employee of this state, or of any political subdivision of this state who knowingly violates the prohibitions in Section 3 of this act shall, on a first violation, be liable for a civil penalty not to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000) which shall be paid into the general fund of the state, and on a second or subsequent violation shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

    B. A political subdivision of this state may not receive state grant funds if the political subdivision adopts a rule, order, ordinance, or policy under which the political subdivision violates Section 3 of this Act. State grant funds for the political subdivision shall be denied for the fiscal year following the year in which a final judicial determination in an action brought under this section is made that the political subdivision has intentionally required actions which violate the prohibitions in Section 3 of this Act.

    SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY

    The provisions of this act are hereby declared to be severable and if any provision of this act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is declared invalid for any reason, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this act.

    SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE

    This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

Like


Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: